Man the Producer, Woman the
Producer-Reproducer
By
Mr. Gavin Bushe
MLIS, B.A. (Hons), Cert.
This short essay is the intellectual
production of a mature proletarian man in the situation of unemployment at the
end of the market clear-out phase of the capitalist recession of 2008 – 2019
AD.
This
humble intellectual production is in dedication to
Karl
Marx.
Man the Producer, Woman the
Producer-Reproducer.
Men and
women differ in how we produce and reproduce reality. Together we are one species, different though
necessary and complementary. In this
essay I will outline my understanding based on dialectical-materialist
philosophy of the problem of gender from a working class man’s perspective.
Specialisation in
Economic Life.
The
economists have generally agreed until now that economic development tends to
result in experts in production, the elite of whom are called specialists. The reason for this tendency is that the
maintenance of the value of labour power requires the constant improvement of
human abilities in any given field of work.
Warfare as the most competitive
expression of human dialectical development is awesome in its specialist
forms.
In
order to secure a return in economic life the experts must specialise in a
given field or fall into obsolescence.
Why would economic actors who meet each other in the wider economy
settle for less than the most excellent, most productive economic
components? They would not. Rather the stages of development of any
economic component is that it advances infinitely through labour,
notwithstanding the limitations of any historical mode of production based on
exploitation of labour by the possessors of social surplus, namely,
Slave-Owning Economy, Feudal Economy, Capitalist Economy, Transitional Socialist
Economy.
Economics
tends towards specialised labour rather than generalised labour for the
maintenance of the value of labour power.
In this regard men are historically the outstanding producers of world
history. Women, by contrast have a dual role
being simultaneously producers and reproducers.
In most historical economies women excelled in producing and reproducing
men. The world-class achievement of
women’s science is called gender studies.
Men of the 21st Century now find themselves in the necessary
position of analysing gender from a uniquely male perspective, independent of
the interpretations of the gender experts and specialists, the women. To produce history it has been necessary to
produce men of excellence, for which women were enlisted via many persuasions,
e.g. religion and culture to that end.
The conditions of late capitalism have coalesced to create a potential
scenario where a historical tangent could occur in the form of women’s command
of capitalism. This would be a gender
order that reverses the traditional complaint of women about men. Because of this end many voices raise the
call for the end of gender equality. On
the one hand reactionary men seek to smash the spectre of communism, while this
communist wishes to rebuke the reactionary men along with the anti-egalitarian
women. A small contingent of men have
organised to create a men’s movement founded on the equality principle. I am one of those such men.
The Advantages of
Economic Specialisation.
When
producers specialise they transcend from primitivity to enlightenment. General labour is typically less effective
than specialised labour in any given activity.
Within the capitalist mode of production specialist labour is better
able to secure and demand higher wages than general labour. Hence there is a difference of social status
between specialised and general labour.
Taking
the example of a given economy such as fire-creation. It is true that historically there is an
immense development from the early flint and tinder, through gas-lighting, to
electric fluorescents to atomic energy, and theoretically into the quantum
energy field. While all of the
aforementioned fire-lighting is essentially the same idea, there is clearly an
order of superiority between each successive manifestation of the idea.
Economic
specialisation permits the achievement of progress. Conversely economic generalisation tends to
result in mediocre progression. To its
chagrin the proletariat find itself continuously subjected to the
specialisations achieved by the bourgeoisie who force the proletariat to adapt
to capitalist needs. In the late
capitalist period a job-for-life has been done away with and flexibility and versatility
has become the new requirement. Thus the
workers are made general workers all of the time. Even worse highly educated labour at the
level of doctorate is not necessarily guaranteed any better position within the framework of
the economy. Without the capital to make
its own reality, even doctors of the proletariat cannot necessarily find work
except in the expansion phase of the decennial capitalist cycle.
It
should remain clear that economic specialisation will remain the necessary
tendency prior to the realisation of the communist mode of production, where
free labour will then be able to excel across multiple disciplines without fear
of redundancy. Specialised economies
also produce more surplus at any given rate of production.
The Disadvantages of
Economic Dualism.
Women
as producer-reproducers automatically fall into a similar reality to general
labour. However the specific reality of
women as producer-reproducers has fascinated social scientists since time
immemorial. Early Capitalism had made
women into donors of value to capitalist men in particular since the mass
inclusion of women’s labour in the factories, etc. Meanwhile proletarian men observed the
decadence attendant upon proletarian women as a result of their enlargement
through their wage-labour. This increase
in the plutocracy for women gave rise to the feminist movement.
The
demands of the feminists resulted in a radical re-division of labour within the
households of the proletarian men on the footing of the equality
principle. I mention in passing that
these economic developments corresponded to a saga of social struggle whose
ultimate end was the victory of the feminist tendency among women.
Economic
Dualism can never realise an equal level of development as compared to Economic
Specialisation due to the inherent calculus of the parallel progression for the
Economic Dualist. Therefore women as
producer-reproducers are forever resigned to the shadow of men as producers. Every sociological manoeuvre has been tested
in order to trump this law of the universe.
Speculatively, the women could simply make men into their wives and
insist that they raise the children. In
such a reality, men as specialists in home economics, would be the
“hand-maidens” of a gynarchy in social terms.
It
remains to be observed whether men would accept such a specialist producer
role. However it would assist but not
solve the limitations of the producer-reproducer role.
The
original Communist egalitarian solution was to communalise the family within
common property relations. Today it
might be to equalise and democratise the family based on private property
relations. Alternative developments
could see the rise of alienation between many men and many women living
separate lives as strangers to each other, or any number of chaotic social
forms based on semi-utopian principles.
The Late-Capitalist Mode
of Production.
The
period of recent history is correctly called the period of Late-Capitalism. This period has been clearly observed since
the counter-revolutionary overthrow of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
in 1991 AD.
The
Late Capitalist period is characterised by all manner of reactionary and triumphalist
calumnies against Marxism. However since
the riddle of history was already solved by Marx in the 19th Century
it is a bit early to celebrate the denial of truth. This is particularly difficult in light of
the twice confirmation of Marxism in this 28 year period. The first confirmation was the devouring of
the Soviet State by counter-revolutionaries within the bureaucracy of the USSR
as predicted by Leon Trotsky in his book, “The Revolution Betrayed: What is the
Soviet Union and where is it going?” in 1936 AD. The second confirmation is the Great
Recession of 2008 to 2019 AD which the world has been destroyed by the
over-production of housing concomitant with the inability of proletarians to
purchase homes or shelter.
The
Late-Capitalist economy rescued itself from revolution by subsidising the
private ownership of housing using the Capitalist State. The debt burden has crippled the ability of
Late-Capitalism to resume general commodity production on the usual time
period. The prognosis is for an extended
economic drag with primitive accumulation to fund the debt burden. The political elections across Europe in 2020
might lead to some new arrangement of calculated debt forgiveness and some
repudiation of debt according to the balance of forces among the usual
political forces historically.
Interestingly the women’s movement has added some spice to the tired
politics. The movement for the
emancipation of women remains a force to be reckoned with as the period emerges
into its next economic take-off.
The Development of the
Character of Men and Women Under the Conditions, Forces, and Relations of Production
Generally Prevalent in Late-Capitalism, 1991-2019 AD.
The
definition of a man as opposed to a woman has become embroiled in controversy
as late as the trans-gender debate. From
the perspective of a materialist assessment this question resolves itself into
a question of “Who is owner of the body?” and “Who is the owner of the
resources?” By genetic design a man is
he who produces and therefore possesses wealth.
By genetic design a woman is she who produces and/or reproduces and
therefore comes under a dependency upon someone else when she reproduces.
Variations
in male and female character are wholly predicated on the relationship of
giving and receiving wealth. Man is the
producer and therefore man gives wealth to the woman, always. This wealth is as
varied as men are. However ultimately it
is his unique genetic signature that is given and then husbanded. Women as producer-reproducers create human
life in their wombs, always.
The
debacle over gender theory results out of the unconscious confusion of some men
and women who find themselves on the wrong side of the dependency
relationship. For example, men without
wealth cannot give that wealth to women.
Therefore they find sexual needs met with other men. Women with too much wealth find that a mere
pauper among the men can no longer satisfy their need for possession in the sex
act. Thus they dispense with the male
component and adopt the female component with an understanding that they have
met their equal. With the aid of new
forces of reproduction women find that they can impregnate themselves with the
genetic material of males who donate to fertility clinics. Furthermore women are able through advanced
reproductive technologies to determine many of the specifics of the children
whom they would like to have or not have.
The
application of capitalist science to shape the character of men and women is a
game-changer in social confusion. Hence
the oft-repeated demands of trans-gender people for recognition. It is a shame that under the banner of
equality and diversity many of the young people of Late-Capitalism are being
stunned by radical gender theory. Boys
in particular are extremely vulnerable in this climate of Late-Capitalist-Feminist
revanchism.
The
struggle for the future of Late-Capitalism has entered the education system
with an unholy force of depredation upon the youth of Late-Capitalism. Such is the long-game for the classes who are
reconciled to perpetual capitalism as they seek to win the old struggle for
civilisation. Only Communism has the
potential to break the deadlock.
The
working men of the world have the potential to liberate themselves and the rest
of society from the dark spell of the spectacle of late capitalist enchantment
that plays out like a sorcerer’s ritual on the global media.
Working
men know the truth. The truth is our
means of setting ourselves free.
Victory upon those working men who embrace the truth of their real
social relations and tell that to power.
Ideologies of the
Producer-Reproducers in Late-Capitalism.
Political
understandings eventually form well-rounded and consistent theories which in
practice become ideologies. The women
are as capable of this activity as anyone.
The old ideologies of the producer-reproducers are now redundant for the
needs of women. Such is the way of the
world that when one thing has served its purpose it is discarded. Therefore in the era ahead we can confidently
say goodbye to the following ideologies of the producer-reproducers: Liberal
Feminism, Radical Feminism, Black Feminism, Third-Wave Feminism.
Post-Feminism.
The
apex of capitalist women in Europe could arguably be said to have be attained
by the ascendency to power in 1979 AD of Mrs Margaret Thatcher. The producer-reproducers of this class were
unable to accept the feminist argument in light of their positions. Therefore they formulated post-feminism in
order to explain how they could advance within the capitalist economic expansion
at the time. The gigantic influx of career-oriented
women into the economy gave a profound strength to this particular ideology
which remains pivotal to the critique of the character of men and women within
the system. Since these women are
associating with the most elite men it is impossible for them to get the upper
hand and therefore they look to the entire world to attack the elite
producers. Thus the slogan “We are the
99%”. Recent reports in the media state
that the billionaires feel oppressed by society. The slogan of equality still remains useful
at the point of call for gender quotas for the position at the summit of world
economic power.
Gynarchism.
The
jettison of the equality agenda is not uncommon within recent history across
the world. Notable examples are: Zanu-PF
in Zimbabwe who no longer believes in racial equality. Zionism in Israel which
no longer believes in religious equality.
Putinism in Russia which obviously does not believe in class equality
even as a pretence of transitional programme.
South African racial equality is threatening to collapse into a revanchist
movement against the former Boer overlords.
So
it is the case also in world politics with many women. Once the fact of combined and uneven
development under capitalism is considered by superior women they seek out
their less developed male counterparts for the purposes of executing an historical
tangent which will only lead to terminal decline of their dystopian societies. The prospect of a female-led polity is quite
tempting to many women who within the hierarchies of the “free and unequal”
social order announced by Francis Fukiyama see no reason to do anything other
than pitilessly tear asunder the producers who they rightly despise for their
inequality of outcome within Late-Capitalism.
The
current gynarchist tendencies in public affairs all share a similar vein of
elaborate matriarchy. This tendency
shares all the hallmarks of a master-gender theory and practice and attracts
lumpen-proletariat elements as much as national socialism or Islamism. We can call this the deformity of feminism. The application of scientific feminist
practices to state policy is taken to its logical solution by gynarchism. This is a warning to the women who read this
essay.
Trotskyist-Feminism.
The
writings of the Marxist-Feminists leave much to be desired in terms of
inclusion for men. These particular
producer-reproducers strive in Communist agitation while they completely ignore
the library of Socialism as though only their recent conclusions in
reproductive rights could be the path of development for Communist men and
women. In particular they simply cannot
comprehend that using State Power against men is wrong when it violates
equality principles. So it is that in
Ireland they moaned about the capitalist state apparatus upon women under the
1983 Pro-Life Amendment to the Irish Constitution as causing a chill
factor. Trostky himself called this type
of reality, “the philosophy of a priest with the power of a gendarme”. Now in 2019 AD the Trotskyist-Feminists have
no comment on the reversal of the situation upon working class men or indeed
any men. The ends justifies the means
when the ends is justified said Trotsky.
That end he had in mind was Socialism.
Today in Ireland with the introduction of the Pro-Choice 36th
Amendment to the Irish Constitution within Late-Capitalist conditions of life
all the joy of existence for many men has been snuffed out by the absolute
authority under the capitalist law for women against men over the fruit of
joint labour, human life.
Islamic-Feminism.
The
teachings of the Holy Qur’an and the Sunna of the Prophet Muhammad are powerful
within the worldwide community of Muslims.
This does not mean that the historical conditions of Late-Capitalism do
not affect the souls of Muslim women.
Lengthy efforts are being made to adjust Islamic interpretation in light
of new economic realities. This brings
Islamic women up-to-date with the worldwide trends across the globe. It is an open question as to whether Islamic
Feminism can square-the-circle on women’s rights or prove an exit point for
Muslim women out of the religion.
Feminism of the Swedish
Model.
The
highest political attainment for women in their own rights has occurred in the Scandinavian
countries especially Sweden by 2019 AD.
In this country we have a self-declared Feminist State. The clampdown on Swedishmen is observable. This particular form of revanchism is the
most likely candidate for a tangent of history.
Here the principle of equality is adhered to at all times but in
practice it means the suppression of all men and in particular young men in
schools, institutions, society and culture.
The promises of the Swedish Feminists sound marvellous before the court
of public opinion. In reality they are a
form of female superiority across the society.
They are a restrained gynarchism.
Christian-Feminism.
The
coalescence of social factors resulting in the anti-Communist womens’ rights
movement is peculiar in the hands of Christian women. They are aware of the Bible. However manifest destiny is a sometimes
difficult to deny. These are perhaps the
women least similar to Mary the Mother of Jesus since St. Paul’s encounter with
the followers of the Goddess Diana at the Temple of Ephesus in the 1st
Millennium AD. They know the rights and
duties of family but they cannot give up their property claims such that both
men and women together could realise a lasting supper of gender justice within
their communities. This branch of producer-reproducers are destined to struggle
with their hearts in light of the promises of a share in Late-Capitalist
sybaritic dues.
Dialectics of
Reproduction.
Dialectics
is the logic of contradiction. It is an
historical advance over Cartesian logic of stasis. It means that material reality is always
undergoing change. Men and women are
very material beings and we undergo change consequent to changes in our social
relations. Those social relations went
through change due to production relations.
Previously the production relations went through change due to
development of the forces of production.
These themselves were situated upon the conditions of production as a
material foundation.
Men
and women almost always want to meet and romance and to have children. This brings up the logic of the contradiction
between the opposites of male and female.
As I have argued in this essay from an economic perspective, men are
producers, and women are producer-reproducers.
In the dialectics of reproduction men produce and earn and then
interpenetrate with producer-reproducers to create babies.
The
social rituals surrounding this phenomenon are different in time and
place. However they never escape the
fundamental economic reality as described.
The Competition for Children.
The
drive to reproduce with all that that entails is so powerful that history can
often change on its basis. Such was the
Anglican Reformation of King Henry Tudor VIII of England when he defied the
Papacy for a divorce from his Catholic wife Catherine of Aragon. Even the people of forgotten places of the
world understand this well. The Late-Capitalism
has created such inequality that human beings lose their minds in the
legitimate effort to become parents.
By
Late-Capitalism the rules of the game are firmly in the court of women. This has made romance into a political
opportunity for the womens’ movement who like to favour and disfavour according
to political considerations. Such is the
culture of sex selection with only those males who are with the programme of
the producer-reproducers. Stories abound
among men in private and on the internet of their treatment at the hands of the
women. This trial of men quickly leads
to a dystopian society very easily.
Men Versus Men Versus
Women and Women.
The
dynamics of the Late-Capitalist dialectics of reproduction under conditions of
socio-economic decline make for a quiet jungle affair among the competitors for
children. Men compete against men. At the same time women understand that it is
best when they club together mostly for the sisterhood of women. The effect on working class unity is
corrosive.
Abortion.
The
3 laws of dialectical development exist in all change. Within the development of new human life they
are extremely clear. Firstly, in the
transformation of quantity into quality as seen under a sonagraph, a zygote
once attached to his or her mother’s placenta undergoes rapid development until
he eventually transforms by cell multiplication into a fully-formed new
child. This represents the
interpenetration of opposites in embryological development (male-female) within
the zygote which continues inevitably until the negation of the negation of the
woman is complete as a birth. In
economic terms the labour of males and females combines in the reproduction of
humanity. The child is the product of
joint labour, either by the love act itself or the provision and tending to the
woman by the man during her incapacity as a pregnant human being. How then can a producer-reproducer say that
it is her body and her choice alone? She
cannot unless she denies the labour of the producer in the pregnancy. It was the joint body in unity between the
man and woman. The fruit of her womb is
a co-production. In any case the woman’s
body produces the child automatically after conception.
How
is possible that she could take a unilateral decision on what is in truth a
co-production? Well, she is a woman
within the Late-Capitalist mode of production.
She knows that the person who possesses anything is the rightful actor
by capitalist laws. Also, does not the
capitalist man appropriate the product of labour from the workers at all
strokes anyway? Yes. He does. Why then would an emancipated women upon seeing
the example of the capitalist man not emulate him and appropriate the
co-production of reproductive labour?
Indeed she does and with the capitalist courts’ endorsement. This is an era of over-ripeness in commodity
production. The women of late capitalism
are also very over-ripe in their opportunities for children. Just as Late-Capitalism wastes and squanders
huge amounts of production on a regular basis, so too does the woman of
Late-Capitalism squander her womb’s fruit appropriately according to choice. Hence, the unstoppable abortion
movement. It is simply the problem of too
many babies and no one to rear them.
The Raising of Children.
The
hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
Jesuits really understand this too.
That’s why they demand the boy at seven that they might produce the man. The struggle for civilisation that has always
rocked the world, now in the era of the rise of the producer-reproducer economy,
sees the battle as taking place from day one of the human being’s life. The state is playing a nefarious role in this
matter. Only recently was a radical
sex-education programme for Irish schools postponed from implementation under
pressure from Irish parents.
Housing.
The
fundamental social unit of society cannot exist on a street corner. Housing is categorically imperative for all
human beings and especially for the co-production of new human life. Across the world there is an estimated 100
million homeless people. In the market
clear-out phase of the Great Recession of 2008-2019 AD housing has become an
issue that has been talked away by Late-Capitalist governments. They have privatised the housing stock at
this point and by various state-backed financial means they have created a new
layer of landlords. Landlords make for
among the most reactionary of social classes.
Although the world’s wealth had never been greater the cunning schemes
by which the propertied reap the surplus is larceny on an immense scale, and
quite legal.
The
Constant Demand for More Living Space.
Upward mobility and the desire for
bigger and better homes and families are a driver of economics among the
working class. Capitalist class families
nowadays live in ivory tower complexes where they probably imagine that they
will ride the storm of each boom-to-bust cycle.
It is women who demand the very best continuously from men with whom
they choose to share a relationship.
This means that production must continue in order to extend to the women
a better living space with the kids.
Family Size.
In
the pro-choice era family size is the executive decision of the women. The burden of the child-raising is still a
key consideration for less wealthy women.
Limitations of Reproductive Potential.
For
the producers their reproductive potential ultimately rests on their consequential
use value as a seller of labour. Among
animals this is known as adaptation to environment through evolutionary
developments that are decisive for the creature in reproducing his genes. Human beings produce their consequential use
values, mainly as tools. However in the
mating game the producer is his own best consequential use value.
For
the producer-reproducers their reproductive potential ultimately rest on their
attractiveness. Her attractiveness is essentially a matter of enigma. She is her own best consequential use
value. Ideally, however love is a matter
of mutual giving.
Sociological
factors of sanction and approval mean that people often cannot pursue their
legitimate interests as co-reproducers or are enhanced in this regard. Religious rules, cultural norms, legal
stipulations, state policies, state law, morality, marital opportunities
according to set-structure, list among the socially-limiting factors of
reproductive potential.
Natural Limitations.
The
natural limitation of reproductive potential for the producer is his age. The natural limitation of reproductive
potential for the producer-reproducer is her period of fertility, which
normally extends from the age of 12 years to approximately 40 years of female
life.
Artificial Limitations.
The
development of contraceptive devices and family planning are often a
self-limiting factor for people. The economic life of women is a clear
artificial restriction upon them. The
producer component of their dual economic agency has increased to such an
extent that their opportunities for child-raising are often self-limited while
they advance in education and work experiences.
The child-rearing domain of the private family also causes women to
self-limit while they advance their productive capacity. The Communist solution of a communal
child-raising crèche is only available under Late-Capitalism to wealthy women
before marriage.
Extension of Reproductive Capacities.
The
application of reproductive science to extend the period of fertility of women
is of interest to those women who due to uneven development of their dual
economy risk childlessness or small family-size. Advances in male dietary nutrition and
healthcare also serve to extend the reproductive capacities of men into their
older years.
Hired Help.
For
women it is possible to hire the specialist labour of nannies and others to
support their dual economy. The
Communist solution to this problem was to make services such as these generally
available to all women on an egalitarian basis.
Late-Capitalism provides these services privately. Only wealthy women can avail of these
additions.
The Role of Men in Late Capitalism as
Concerns Child-Raising.
The
desire for more flexible and suitable support from men in a permanent
relationship with women has led to a steady attempt to erode the taboo on
direct male involvement in child-raising.
At the same time childless men are shunned on the basis of mistrust. Women also demand that trusted and approved
men take up a role in the child-raising concerns, although they sanction
heavily the ones of whom they disapprove.
This combined irony of women’s self-entitlement has led to a significant
increase in renegade male populations who represent a loss to the society.
The State and its
Powers.
The
state is a machine for the domination of one class over another according to
the political-philosopher and revolutionary leader Vladimir Lenin. Within Late-Capitalism this is an opportunity
for competitive interests to drive home Gender theory in practice. Unsurprisingly the entire state affair is
controlled by capitalists and feminists in one composition or another. Last for consideration by these political
powers are the proletarian men. He who
controls the State controls the future. Therefore the equality mantra is
employed to secure more women statesmen.
For the present time capitalists, feminists, and their labour movement
tail-ends are content to present to the world the equality principle in
relation to women and politics. This is
essential within an electoral system where women are the gender majority voting
bloc at 51%. It is only recently that
women-specific political parties have emerged since embedding the political
interests of women within the established historical political movements has
proved highly successful. The explicitly
State Feminist Parties are hampered by their honesty before the electorate as
are the Communist Parties.
Security for Women.
The
ambivalence of women as regards male aggression is a social dilemma. On the one
hand women hate physically abusive men.
On the other they distain timidity or effete behaviour from among
heterosexual men. This creates a problem
whereby they demand police services for the men they have a problem with. The fear factor for women generates a demand
for a security state.
The State Law and its Various Applications.
The
ongoing rape and sexual misconduct charges brought by some women against
certain men has become infamous before the court of the official media. This is surely a political cultural movement
to pressure incumbent politicians to act in the women’s social interests. The pressure has been successful in Sweden
where the Feminists came to power by surprise after having quietly and
persistently burrowed into the socio-economic foundations of that society. Within any statute are laws for all manner of
social control. The ancient laws against
so-called mentally-ill people are extremely effective in the hands of
producer-reproducers. The intersection
of women’s politics with the Mental Health Laws are worthy of much study. This is a versatile law that cuts straight to
the heart of the problem for women. The
ambivalence of the women as regards males is resolved by recourse to the sectioning
of men whom they accuse of being threatening.
Going further with Fem-power is the new abortion act in Ireland which
now permits the abortion of children without question for up to 12 weeks of the
early life of the Irish children. The
taxpayer foots the bill. This means that
men who are pro-life must pay for the abortions of their pro-choice neighbours. At this stage the domestic life of Irish and
British women resembles a gender absolutism.
The Family Courts and Their Rulings.
The
Family Courts in Late-Capitalism are by now replete with legal precedents such
that family law is really a fait-accompli for the women’s side of any family dispute. Men’s histories go unrecorded where they
report being held at gunpoint by Irish police in child custody affairs.
Female Judges.
It
is understood that Judges are impartial arbiters of justice. The law is increasing female-oriented in
family matters.
Male Judges.
It
is understood that Judges are impartial arbiters of justice. The law is increasingly female-oriented in
family matters.
The Welfare State.
The
conquest of economic concessions from the capitalist class by the classical
labour movement has endured up until today.
The flourishing of this labour movement victory is called the Welfare
State in Europe. Through the historical
class-based pressure of the workers’ movement across Europe human rights have
been really won for all.
The Constant Demand for Provision to
the Producer-Reproducers.
As
can be easily demonstrated social freedom in a market economy is a function of
independent access to economic resources.
Since women have a dualist economy they are unable to secure equal
resources as compared to producers without the aid of intermediaries. What this means is that women understand that
men are a resource due to our economic specialisations. For the past century resources have been
continuously transferred from men to women through the intermediary of the State
Policies on the rights of women, children and the family. The economic transfer has been almost an
absolute success for women. The freedom
of women is now observable and praised in the Late-Capitalist media.
Education of Children by the State.
Chief
among the best economic resources to have is good education. The political concerns of the
producer-reproducers realise a command of the classroom experience. Most teachers in State schools are
women. The propagation of
producer-reproducer ideologies within the education system is self-evident in
its results and consequences. Boys are
out. Girls are in. From primary school onwards the young women
are the recipients of the lionesses’ share of all good things in educational
development. With such an expansion of investment in girls as preferred to boys
the future is considered female. At all
levels of education except professorial roles women outperform men on the basis
of an enhanced calculus of development of their producer component due to socio-political
design. Only by the time women focus on
the reproductive component of their dual economy do they slow down in relation
to producers in terms of attainment.
However the equality argument is useful to demand gender quotas for
professorial roles at the highest level of education. The rest is subtle humour for the State
administrators as the elite educators pretend not to understand the outcomes of
their work. Generally it is working
class males who underperform since the tide of history necessarily required a
fall-guy and we are the ones in the dock.
Gender Dystopia and the Part-Production of Producers.
Now
that women’s rule is at an unheard of level in Late-Capitalism, for the first
time in human history it is possible to permanently ruin working class
men. The suicide rates of working class
men is significantly skewed at all age brackets but particularly in the formative
and prime years of male life. The
observers of the male gender dystopia scratch their heads in wonder at the
complete obvious. Clearly on an
unconscious level the men understand that the system is rigged and act out this
unconscious rage in acts of violence and death.
The underdevelopment of specialist producers in the economy has led to
many conversations about “feelings” while the facts are simply not admitted
about the mode of production as an egalitarian fraud.
Gender Dystopia and the Full Production of Producer-Reproducers.
After
the Great Recession of 2008-2019 AD which hit men harder than women it has
become known to the public consciousness that women are somewhat “superior” to
men. The cup of the producer-reproducers
overflows from every economic position. Women’s dual economy is fully developed
on both sides. She is at capacity by the
age of 40. She is now faced with the
choice of whether to explore motherhood or continue with production.
The Attempt to Characterise Men as Being Without a Specialist Economic Role.
Upon
the juncture of their late 30s women understand that they would like choice,
especially now that the world is their oyster.
To this end their master manipulation of men is not yet finished. In order to convince the specialist producers
that the public role is not necessarily for them, but rather that they too have
choice, the women seek to characterise mens’ economic futures as not
necessarily a public role as had been the case for all hitherto recorded
history. It my prediction that the men
will simply leave the women holding the babies.
The Conclusion of the
Male – Female Conflict as the Conflict of Private Properties.
The
problem for men and women under capitalism has been the expropriation of
working class men of all remaining fragments of private property and the
employment of proletarian women in public economy rather than proletarian men. There could only ever have been a Communist
solution to this world historic socio-economic problem. The first attempt to build a workers state
globally was ceremoniously taken down by siege warfare and undermining between
1917 AD and 1991 AD. The Late-Capitalist experience of the social question for
the revolutionary proletariat has undergone a reactionary tangent which is
expressed as the womens’ movement. On the basis of private property there can
be no equality between men and women.
The conclusion of the gender dialectic that was latent in the class
dialectic all the way through the 20th Century is realised in the
early period of the 21st Century as Capitalist-Feminism.
Communism or Feminism?
Should
proletarian men accept Capitalist-Feminism as an end to history? The future of male-female relations is likely
to called a matriarchy in the language of Capitalist-Feminists. In some
communities in Late-Capitalism gynarchism is rampant. The usual reactionary traditions of male
combat seek to enlist women in their train for ambitious political projects. Very notably those microscopic traditions are
Fascism and Islamism. The problem is
still transparent: it is the failure of the revolutionary working class men to
convince the wider working class men of our historic mission to organise for
the future of mankind. In order to
protect men from the degrading effects of Capitalist-Feminist spiritualities
this author humbly recommend a spiritual discipline for men to combat the
enervating effects of a degenerating Capitalist-Feminist dystopian order.
The Islamic Ethic and the Spirit of
Communism.
I
would like to contradict Karl Marx on one point concerning the sigh of the
oppressed creature under religion and that is to say that religion offers a
motive force for the development of the human capacity for spiritual health and
ethics. Bread and prayer are excellent
companions on the road to revolutionary outcomes. The spirit of communism is rooted in
religious traditions. I think that it is
a Leninist error to obliterate religion.
Manifest destiny can occur for workers too. I regard Islam as the most suitable religious
option for Communists due to its semi-monastic discipline.
Excellence in Men and Women.
The
practice of Islam has always given to human beings an elevated state of
character and guidance when followed sincerely and progressively. To a revolutionary mind the Qur’an is a
revelation which holds promise for the oppressed. Working class men and women stand to benefit
from the regime of moral excellence that Islam offers. In its pillar of Ramadan Islam realises
Communist ideals of common brotherhood and common collectivised work and
sharing of resources and meals as equals.
The religion differs from many others by a balanced view of worldly and
spiritual concerns. It is the most
Communistic religion from among all the prophetic traditions handed down from
previous revolutions. Its tragedy is
that it has mainly been used as a veil for imperialism. I see its strength in its purely private form
and within an Enlightenment secular ideal.
It can redeem any slave of capital be they male or female when read in
an egalitarian light.
Law of Beauty.
Marx
aspired for the future of humanity that we would under Communism leave the law
of necessity behind and embrace the law of beauty. Islam too understood this at the Alhambra,
the Taj Mahal, the Ayah Sofia and also in the relics of Islamic science which
can still impress a fair-minded human.
Moreover Islam can transform men and women from apes into human beings. In time it is a brilliant antidote to
ignorance. I highly recommend embracing
this faith as a Communist. It is a light
that never goes out. Revolutionary
Communism is compatible with Islamic Sciences.
Cleanliness.
The
simplest way to enhance one’s character as a producer or producer-reproducer is
to keep clean. Islam trains people in
hygiene and purity. Five times per day
Muslims perform a ritual bath to clean themselves before prayer.
Scrupulousness.
Under
a seething Late-Capitalist plutocracy, money is a destructive power throughout
society. No self-respecting Communist
would trade in the manner of the capitalists and their hangers-on. Islam confirms the need to deal justly in all
financial transactions. What better way
to make distinct the class of the future from the erstwhile class of the
present?
Sharing.
What
could be more Communist than working together and sharing together? Within Islam high emphasis is placed on the
common good. The practice of Zakat is
indicative of Communist understandings about redistribution of resources on the
basis of need.
Labour.
Hard
work and progressive practice are part of Islam. The early Muslims were progressively
developed by their Islam from a dark age into some of the best historical
figures. Muhammad himself was an
exemplary human being. That is the standard of any Communist under Communism.
Covering of the Body.
The
decadence of Capitalist-Feminism combined with the chaos in sexual matters
since the Great Recession of 2008-2019 AD shocks the mind of the man of
letters. It is high time that working
men do the right thing and say the right thing to the women around them. This is civilised behaviour.
Sobriety.
The
legendary influence of alcohol on the manhood of men needs no elaboration. Islam strikes out this foul influence on the
slaves of capital by urging teetotalism.
The minds of working men are bastions of the revolutionary
consciousness. Let us protect ourselves
at once.
Rationalism.
Truthfulness
and rationality are seeds of Enlightenment.
The French Revolution gained momentum on the basis of a rigorous
analysis of human life by the philosophes.
The impetus to justice was developed by men and women who undertook the
extraordinary. This is good by any
definition. Reason, Science, and the
assumption of collective ownership of the means of production, distribution and
exchange by the industrial proletariat will happen inevitably by our class
struggles. Islam accelerates the
recovery process from decline for Communist practitioners.
The Tyranny of Money.
The
3 volumes of Capital by Karl Marx and the 4th volume of Capital,
known as “Theories of Surplus Value” by Karl Kautsky are sufficient as a prove
of the hideous mastery of human life by money and its representatives, the
capitalist class. Today’s Great
Recessionary economy escapes its barriers by a producing a global market of
private corporations where the rigour of working life in some cases corresponds
to a psychiatric unit in terms of its technological discipline upon working
class men and women. Beyond the
workplace the rule of money interferes in human relations like a spiritual
thief.
Opposition to the Appropriation of the Economy by Monetary Supremacies.
Communists
have the urgent duty to expose the firesales of entire capitals by capitalist
governments around the world and their conversion into private kingdoms of the
capitalists of various grades resulting from this Great Recession. Our world is not for sale. We own it together by right and its continued
possession and exchange by the capitalists across the globe is theft of our
common property!
The Urgent Communist Demand to
Collectivise the Financial Services Sector.
Since
the advent of Neo-Conservative or Neo-Liberal economic policies around the
world the capitalist system has been exposed as a banking apparatus. We Communist must oppose this power. The Collectivisation of the Financial
Services Sectors around the world by the revolutionary proletariat is the best
focus for anger and grief – not other peoples.
The Education of Proletarians Concerning the Danger to Their Historic Mission Posed by Counter-Historical and Historically Tangential Tendencies.
Capitalist
Tyranny has made many of the workers forget that we have a world to win for the
future of humanity. We have been
threatened immensely by the philosophical, ideological, and religious
opposition to our movement by forces loyal to the conservation of private
property. To overcome this we must as
Communists remind and explain to proletarians that our class is the class of
the future. All other statements about
the future are historically tangential and limit development into a mere
rearranging of the social furniture of capitalist class social relations.
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: the Old-Beauties Must Revive!
When
the old crap revives, we must revive the old beauties. Therefore the echo of the French Revolution
can never be ignored by the capitalist class.
This is our revolutionary inheritance as working men of the world. Let us revive and remember it in our affairs.
The Unity of the Proletariat and the Inevitable Overthrow of All Existing Social Conditions.
The
isolation of the workers due to competition is replaced by our revolutionary
combination due to association. This
unity of the working class men is the cultural power that must be promoted as
the spark of Communist Revolution.
The Spectre of Communism and the Endless Polemical War Against the Erstwhile Reactionaries and the Neo-Adversaries of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, i.e. Communism.
Today
we must boldly go forth in all of our unique Communist tendencies of which my
simple polemic here is just an example to fight a war of ideas against our
adversaries. The old reactionaries
linger on for want of anything new.
However the neo-adversaries of Late Capitalism whose common denominator
is a cynical contempt for genuine equality must be opposed relentlessly. With liberty, equality, and fraternity
combined we already have with us the seeds of world revolution for the working
men of all countries. Our revolution,
unlike others will be established on the ultimate form of human equality, from
which there can be no deviation. Consider
this polemic and share it with other people.
You have within you the power to write your own. Thank you for reading and I hope that you
will give my argument its consideration.
Finally to Reiterate the
Call of Justice.
Working Men of the World Unite! You Have Nothing to Lose but Your Chains!
References:
“The less the skill and exertion or strength implied in
manual labor, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labor of men superseded by
that of women.”
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848) “Manifesto of the Communist
Party”. Available at: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Manifesto_of_the_Communist_Party/1
[Accessed 01 December 2019]
Trotsky, L.
(1936) “The Revolution Betrayed: What is the Soviet Union and Where is it
going?” Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1936/revbet/ [Accessed 01 December 2019]
